Chrysler Concorde 1998 vs BMW 8 series 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Chrysler Concorde is available only with front wheel drive, while BMW 8 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | 3.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 203 - 253 HP | 320 - 530 HP | |
Torque: | 258 - 339 NM | 500 - 750 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.5 seconds | 3.7 - 5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 10.8 | 6.2 - 10.5 | |
Chrysler Concorde petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 8 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.29 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.34 m | |
Chrysler Concorde is 44 cm longer than the BMW 8 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Concorde is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 420 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
Chrysler Concorde has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Concorde has 110 litres more trunk space than the BMW 8 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`318 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 69 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Concorde has
|
BMW 8 sērija has
| |